Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Given That All Those Colleges and Universities Say Their Studies Show That Marijuana is Beneficial

Seriously.
Not even the benefit of the doubt?


The list grows with each coming month. The National Institute of Health, in their devious endeavor to portray marijuana as bad, inadvertently opened the flood gates to the cure for cancer.
Interesting that their narrow mindedness continues, of course. It has gone on for some 80 years.
.,;,.,;,.,;,.,;,.,;,.
The NIH has grown to encompass nearly 1% of the Federal government's operating budget. The NIH now controls over 50% of all funding for health research, as well as 85% of all funding for colleges and universities. That's a total of about two thirds of ALL money spent on research and medical study, and in America, that total is about $500 Billion Annually. (1)
.,;,.,;,.,;,.,;,.,;,.


that means that, since NIH controls 2/3 of the money, that they wield about $300 Billion a year, spent where THEY want to spend, to state what THEY want to state, and call the shots THEY want to call.


And you can bet that Colleges and Universities take them up on their offers of money. And even so, they rarely get any new "dirt" to throw at marijuana, and more often than not, the researchers recognized the significance of the study, and continued as far as they could into a cure for cancer.


_,_._,_._,_._,_._,_


But what will they say to America, to the politicians, to the President? I mean...that's a LOT of LOOT that they throw around.
What news from the Mark?
Well, I'm glad you asked.
They give us Dr. Harry J. Anslinger's words.
And his absolute guarantee of credibility...


even though he is NOT a doctor...
even though he never DID the research he claims to have done...
even though his claims were rarely, if ever, backed by physical evidence...


But still, those are the very words that the National Institute of Health use today.


And now they have gone and given those words to the President of the United States of America as if they were the truth.
Fact is, the NIH acts more like Bush junior and Cheney than the responsible bastion of research they portray themselves as.






(1)
 http://www.jstor.org/pss/649307

No comments: